Improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) has attracted considerable interest. Recent approaches primarily focus on improving the reasoning process to yield a more precise final answer.

Citation networks are critical infrastructures of modern science, serving as intricate webs of past literature and enabling researchers to navigate the knowledge production system. To mine information hiding in the link space of such networks, predicting which previous papers (candidates) will a new paper (query) cite is a critical problem that has long been studied. However, an important gap remains unaddressed: the roles of a paper's citations vary significantly, ranging from foundational knowledge basis to superficial contexts. Distinguishing these roles requires a deeper understanding of the logical relationships among papers, beyond simple edges in citation networks. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) with textual reasoning capabilities offers new possibilities for discerning these relationships, but there are two major challenges. First, in practice, a new paper may select its citations from gigantic existing papers, where the combined texts far exceed the context length of LLMs. Second, logical relationships between papers are often implicit, and directly prompting an LLM to predict citations may lead to results based primarily on surface-level textual similarities, rather than the deeper logical reasoning required. In this paper, we introduce the novel concept of core citation, which identifies the critical references that go beyond superficial mentions.

We consider a structured multi-label prediction problem where the labels are organized under implication and mutual exclusion constraints. A major concern is to produce predictions that are logically consistent with these constraints. To do so, we formulate this problem as an embedding inference problem where the constraints are imposed onto the embeddings of labels by geometric construction. Particularly, we consider a hyperbolic Poincaré ball model in which we encode labels as Poincaré hyperplanes that work as linear decision boundaries. The hyperplanes are interpreted as convex regions such that the logical relationships (implication and exclusion) are geometrically encoded using the insideness and disjointedness of these regions, respectively. We show theoretical groundings of the method for preserving logical relationships in the embedding space. Extensive experiments on 12 datasets show 1) significant improvements in mean average precision; 2) lower number of constraint violations; 3) an order of magnitude fewer dimensions than baselines.

Improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) has attracted considerable interest.

OWL (Web Ontology Language) ontologies which are able to formally represent complex knowledge and support semantic reasoning have been widely adopted across various domains such as healthcare and bioinformatics. Recently, ontology embeddings have gained wide attention due to its potential to infer plausible new knowledge and approximate complex reasoning. However, existing methods face notable limitations: geometric model-based embeddings typically overlook valuable textual information, resulting in suboptimal performance, while the approaches that incorporate text, which are often based on language models, fail to preserve the logical structure. In this work, we propose a new ontology embedding method OnT, which tunes a Pretrained Language Model (PLM) via geometric modeling in a hyperbolic space for effectively incorporating textual labels and simultaneously preserving class hierarchies and other logical relationships of Description Logic EL. Extensive experiments on four real-world ontologies show that OnT consistently outperforms the baselines including the state-of-the-art across both tasks of prediction and inference of axioms. OnT also demonstrates strong potential in real-world applications, indicated by its robust transfer learning abilities and effectiveness in real cases of constructing a new ontology from SNOMED CT. Data and code are available at https://github.com/HuiYang1997/OnT.

Improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) has attracted considerable interest. Recent approaches primarily focus on improving the reasoning process to yield a more precise final answer. This oversight could lead to a superficial understanding and interaction with the context, potentially undermining the quality and reliability of the reasoning outcomes. In this paper, we propose an information re-organization (\textbf{InfoRE}) method before proceeding with the reasoning to enhance the reasoning ability of LLMs. Our re-organization method involves initially extracting logical relationships from the contextual content, such as documents or paragraphs, and subsequently pruning redundant content to minimize noise.

Citation networks are critical infrastructures of modern science, serving as intricate webs of past literature and enabling researchers to navigate the knowledge production system. To mine information hiding in the link space of such networks, predicting which previous papers (candidates) will a new paper (query) cite is a critical problem that has long been studied. However, an important gap remains unaddressed: the roles of a paper's citations vary significantly, ranging from foundational knowledge basis to superficial contexts. Distinguishing these roles requires a deeper understanding of the logical relationships among papers, beyond simple edges in citation networks. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) with textual reasoning capabilities offers new possibilities for discerning these relationships, but there are two major challenges.

Synthetic tabular data have widespread applications in industrial domains such as healthcare, finance, and supply chains, owing to their potential to protect privacy and mitigate data scarcity. However, generating realistic synthetic tabular data while preserving inter-column logical relationships remains a significant challenge for the existing generative models. To address these challenges, we propose LLM-TabFlow, a novel approach that leverages Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning to capture complex inter-column relationships and compress tabular data, while using Score-based Diffusion to model the distribution of the compressed data in latent space. Additionally, we introduce an evaluation framework, which is absent in literature, to fairly assess the performance of synthetic tabular data generation methods in real-world contexts. Using this framework, we conduct extensive experiments on two real-world industrial datasets, evaluating LLM-TabFlow against other five baseline methods, including SMOTE (an interpolation-based approach) and other state-of-the-art generative models. Our results show that LLM-TabFlow outperforms all baselines, fully preserving inter-column relationships while achieving the best balance between data fidelity, utility, and privacy. This study is the first to explicitly address inter-column relationship preservation in synthetic tabular data generation, offering new insights for developing more realistic and reliable tabular data generation methods.

To evaluate the fidelity of synthetic tabular data, numerous metrics have been proposed to assess accuracy and diversity, including both low-order statistics (e.g., Density Estimation and Correlation Score (Zhang et al., 2023), Average Coverage Scores (Zein & Urvoy, 2022)) and high-order statistics (e.g., α-Precision and β-Recall (Alaa et al., 2022)). However, these metrics operate at a high level and fail to evaluate whether synthetic data preserves logical relationships, such as hierarchical or semantic dependencies between features. This highlights the need for a more fine-grained, context-aware evaluation of multivariate dependencies. To address this, we propose three evaluation metrics: Hierarchical Consistency Score (HCS), Multivariate Dependency Index (MDI), and Distributional Similarity Index (DSI). To assess the effectiveness of these metrics in quantifying inter-column relationships, we select five representative tabular data generation methods from different categories for evaluation. Their performance is measured using both existing and our proposed metrics on a real-world dataset rich in logical consistency and dependency constraints. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our proposed metrics and reveal the limitations of existing approaches in preserving logical relationships in synthetic tabular data. Additionally, we discuss potential pathways to better capture logical constraints within joint distributions, paying the way for future advancements in synthetic tabular data generation.